The Performance Merino Baselayer Specialists
NZ Merino -
CUSTOMER SERVICE HERE TO HELP COMPANY INFO LINKS
CHOCOLATE FISH MERINO LLP, Reg. Office: 26 Regent Avenue, Leeds LS18 4NJ, West Yorkshire, UK.
Reg. In England & Wales Company Reg. No. OC334027
Chocolate Fish Merino LLP all rights reserved
SECURE SHOPPING
MALLORY'S GEAR: Everest Expedition 1924In October 2005, Lancaster University Management School published a report on the analysis of the clothing Mallory wore on his 1924 Everest Expedition. The results were presented at the Pertex Clothing for Extremes Conference, held at the Rheged Discovery Centre. "Equipped with meager equipment and scanty knowledge of high altitude climbing ..."*. is how the Mallory Expedition is described in "The Mystery of Mallory and Irvine" by Tom Holzel & Audrey Salkeld*.
The authors state: The discovery of Mallory's body by a team led by Eric Simonson therefore opened the door to some unique and priceless research. The results of a three-year project led by IEED's Professor Mary Rose to create testable replicas of George Mallory's climbing gear - worn on his ill-fated 1924 Everest expedition - show that Mallory was equipped with lighter, freer moving clothing and footwear than current day climbers. In fact Mallory was wearing clothing that was some 20% lighter than modern mountaineering gear. The Universities of Lancaster, Southampton, Leeds and Derby combined their expertise to assess the artefacts and clothing found with Mallory's body on Everest. Replica clothing, worn in the tests by Mountaineer Graham Hoyland, proved conclusively that the clothing George Mallory wore for climbing Everest was more than adequate for the elements. Mallory's total clothing weight on Everest in 1924 was 4.160g, compared with the modern equivalent worn by Alan Hinkes, on Everest in 2005 which weighed 4.825g . Mallory wore a very effective system of layers that allowed freedom of movement. Analysis of Mallory's gear proves that there was nothing about either the clothing or footwear that would have in itself prevented a successful ascent of Everest. In fact the lightweight nature of the clothing was ideally suited and would have given a distinct advantage to Mallory. WOOL!In Mallory's case, the wool was interlayered with silk, but this was more for itch-reduction and ease of layering, than for anything else. Graham Hoyland, who wore the Mallory replicas, is quoted as saying "I immediately found the [woolen] underclothes warm to put on, whereas the modern polypropylene underwear feels cold and clammy….Like most mountaineers, I am used to synthetic outdoor clothing: polypropylene underclothes and outer fleeces …They are unforgiving in stretch, and begin to smell unpleasant if worn for more than a couple of days. There is a harsh synthetic sensation next to your skin."This, as you might guess, is a bit of a blow to the synthetics industry who fund much of the research, and also fund the annual Clothing for Extremes Conference. Strangely enough, they have gone very silent on the findings of the research! There was one modern improvement though - zip fasteners! Other than that - wool wins hands down for lightness, freedom of movement, warmth and, when modern superfine Merino is added to the equation, comfort. For more info. see BBC article.
*p. xvii, The Mystery of Mallory and Irvine, Tom Holzel & Audrey Salkeld, Pimlico, Random House, 1986. Revised ed. With Foreword by Eric Simonson, 1999.
**p.68 ibid. |
| South Island New Zealand |
| North Island New Zealand |
| Merino-Possum care |
| Moth damage - prevention |
| Postage & Packing |
| Shipping costs |
| Track your order |
| Terms & Conditions |